South Korea is not a nation governed by the rule of law! The judiciary even became mad
The tangled in Japan-Korea relations, judicial decisions that outrageous in Korea is one after another. The "prohibition of ex post facto law" is a principle early this month we, the modern law
In addition to the judgment of the Constitutional Court that deviates has been made, and the High Court ruling that allows the individual compensation claims have become extinct in 1965 to July
2 also came out. Kazuya Maruyama of the Liberal Democratic Party and worked as an international lawyer, was popular because of "law center that can matrix" TV show
Upper House member raised the voice of anger "Korea has not been the rule of law" he said.
That Japan and South Korea round of the East Asia Football Cup in men's (July 28), South Korea has brought the sport to politics, praised the terrorist
It is a problem, but in Korea, jurisdiction should be equal and fair has also become funny.
All in "international, Maruyama, who familiar with the justice of the country has been the law as it is. Political criticism is hard to say that the rule of law in Korea.
It is not taken the legal appearance only of "anti-Japanese political retaliation". I is impossible. "It's a country with low cultural level" from developed countries
And that "no choice even think.
Mr. Maruyama's pointed out first, it's determined that South Korea Constitutional Court ruled in the 4th.
I was the constitutionality of the law to confiscate property got a knighthood in the governance era dominated by the Japanese of "pro-Japanese", to nationalization. And any at the time
It can be said that justice and had admitted to "foul" condemn by law made after the act was not illegal.
Korea reign of "Japan is different from exploitation type rule of Western European countries, road, power, such as school, together with the influential people and capitalist South Korea
I have developed infrastructure. But the individuals who have contributed to the modernization of Korea is confiscated property "pro-Japanese" "(Maruyama)
Abnormality of Korea justice is not limited to just this.
In the 30th and the 10th July, there was a High Court to order the individual compensation, such as unpaid wages in South Korea who were commandeered to war during the Japanese occupation.
Compensation problem is, "We finally settled completely and" Japan and Korea claims agreement of 1965, the Korean government also drafted the original factory
It has not admitted to Japan claims, but ruled that constitutional court finds in May 2000, led to the High Court ruling
Maruyama said even after being resolved in the "right to claim agreement, the court to admit the claim is intended to give priority to Korean domestic law to international agreements
It does not become the story. I point a finger at the "is proof that justice of South Korea has become a tool of politics.
In fact, international law era, Mr. Maruyama has a bitter experience in the incident with South Korea.
About 15 years ago, Mr. Maruyama will be with Japanese companies representative of international arbitration cases a complaint against Korean companies, won a claim of several tens of million yen.
Effect of the decision was also approved in the courts of South Korea, but the execution of the sentence can not be hard. Court is going to move to debt collection
I did not. Tried my hand in all directions, but for Maruyama, who could not debt collection, Korean lawyers prosecutor OB is
That was Oshiesatoshi way.
"I do not want to do it and it is a grudge to Japan in Korea, Nante confiscate the property of Korean for Japanese. I'm a level like that"
Beyond the level of the rule of law anymore, South Korea Is not it's not even "the judgment of good and evil".
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, promote the values diplomacy to strengthen cooperation with countries that share the "rule of law" and democracy, Mr. Maruyama and "judicial
Distinction of politics is even does not seem to be established, as a partner of values diplomacy, Korea that "does not reach the passing score.
Still the third largest export destination countries, South Korea has also shared interests of security to begin exploring North Korea for Japan.
On the other hand, since taking office, and has not held talks with (Park Ohakune) President Park Geun-hye, South Korean government has been increasingly criticized by visiting Yasukuni Ministers Prime Minister Abe.
"In response as resolute to rectify the historical recognition of South Korea, should promote cooperation in security and economic indifferently in a production-oriented," Mr. Maruyama and
It pointed out and asking you stick to "pacifism of resolution" to Abe.
Do not have to rush. There is no sense doing prospect of its own way and not stand. "Japan-Korea summit meeting is a domestic issue only the Yasukuni Shrine,
And is not intended to be subject to interference in domestic affairs of other countries. 365 days If you say Abe may have to refrain from a little, and to worship anyway,
Should I do worship the Yasukuni Shrine "
The President Park, some within the Japanese government, such as appointing a pro-Japanese group to the secretary, and expectations for the thaw, but 15 days of this month
Ensure momentum is anti-Japanese's rise to ("light Liberation Day" in Korea) anniversary of the end of World War II. To Korea posture to sit down and is likely to be asked to Prime Minister Abe
http://www.zakzak.co.jp/society/politics/news/20130808/plt1308081811007-n1.htm
